<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Friends With Candy &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/category/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog</link>
	<description>good things for (sometimes) good people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>APA Style Guides &#8211; such fun!</title>
		<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/228/apa-style-guides-such-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/228/apa-style-guides-such-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(More clearing of links.) I spent some time writing in the sciences and APA (American Psychological Association) is a frequently asked for standard. I&#8217;m not a big fan of it personally, but here are some style guides and help on implementing it if the need ever arises:

APA Style Guide &#8211; M. Plonsky, Ph.D.
APA Style Essentials
Write [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(More clearing of links.) I spent some time writing in the sciences and APA (American Psychological Association) is a frequently asked for standard. I&#8217;m not a big fan of it personally, but here are some style guides and help on implementing it if the need ever arises:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.uwsp.edu/psych/apa4b.htm#IIHc">APA Style Guide &#8211; M. Plonsky, Ph.D.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.vanguard.edu/faculty/ddegelman/index.aspx?doc_id=796">APA Style Essentials</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thewritesource.com/APA/APA.HTM">Write Source: APA Style</a></li>
<li><a href="http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/">APA Formatting and Style Guide: In-Text Citations: The Basics &#8211; The OWL at Purdue</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/tutorials/citing/apa.html">APA Style examples, Citing and referencing tutorial, Monash University Library</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.allenandunwin.com/spss/APAStyle.pdf#search=%22apa%20style%20guide%20standard%20error%20graphs%22">APA Style Paper</a> [pdf]</li>
<li><a href="http://www.lib.unimelb.edu.au/collections/dookielib/StyleGuide2006.pdf#search=%22apa%20style%20guide%20standard%20error%20graphs%22">Uni of Melbourne APA Style Guide</a> [pdf]</li>
<li><a href="http://www.library.uq.edu.au/training/citation/apa.pdf#search=%22apa%20style%20guide%22">Uni of Qld APA Style Guide </a>[pdf]</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/228/apa-style-guides-such-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not only men who &#8220;naturally&#8221; stray</title>
		<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/227/its-not-only-men-who-naturally-stray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/227/its-not-only-men-who-naturally-stray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an oldie from 1999, but I&#8217;m clearing my many many links, and it&#8217;s an interesting piece of research. So it&#8217;s not only men who &#8220;naturally&#8221; stray in the cause for better genes:
BBC NEWS &#124; Science/Nature &#124; Women&#8217;s choice of men goes in cycles  
Women are attracted to more masculine-looking men at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an oldie from 1999, but I&#8217;m clearing my many many links, and it&#8217;s an interesting piece of research. So it&#8217;s not only men who &#8220;naturally&#8221; stray in the cause for better genes:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/376321.stm">BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Women&#8217;s choice of men goes in cycles</a> <br /> <br />
<blockquote>Women are attracted to more masculine-looking men at the most fertile time of their menstrual cycle, psychologists have shown.</p>
<p>During the less fertile times, they choose men with more feminine-looking faces. These are seen as kinder and more co-operative, but less strong and healthy genetically.</p>
<p>A controversial implication of the new research is that, in evolutionary terms, it is natural for a woman to be unfaithful in order to secure both the best genes and the best carer for her children.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/227/its-not-only-men-who-naturally-stray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/123/evolution-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/123/evolution-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study published (subscription only) in PNAS by two scientists in WA (Australia) and the US has found that:
beetles with the biggest horns have the smallest testes, showing that in evolutionary terms you cannot have it all. [ABC Online]
Apparently according to earlier research by the scientists, the smaller horned (and sometimes hornless) males have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0603474103v1?maxtoshow=&#038;HITS=10&#038;hits=10&#038;RESULTFORMAT=&#038;fulltext=emlen&#038;searchid=1&#038;FIRSTINDEX=0&#038;resourcetype=HWCIT">A recent study published (subscription only) in PNAS</a> by two scientists in WA (Australia) and the US has found that:<br />
<blockquote>beetles with the biggest horns have the smallest testes, showing that in evolutionary terms you cannot have it all. [<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200610/s1767184.htm">ABC Online</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently according to earlier research by the scientists, the smaller horned (and sometimes hornless) males have much more powerful sperm and are much sneakier!</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead, small, hornless males seem to invest their limited resources in longer sperm and disproportionately larger testes, compensating for their inability to guard a female by ejaculating more seminal fluid per copulation. In this way, small males may increase the odds of fertilizing an egg each time they manage to sneak past their larger competitors who mate more often but possibly with less efficiency. When unable to scuttle past their larger opponents, sneaker males may even dig side tunnels into a female&#8217;s chamber, where they are often detected by the resident guard and booted out. In the midst of all this rivalry, the female seems equally willing to mate with any male who manages to reach her, and it is likely that the competition continues within her, between the sperm of rival males. Thus the tradeoffs associated with horns may explain why males have evolved the two alternate mating strategies of guarding and sneaking. [<a href="http://www.princeton.edu/~innov/may2004/m2004beetle.htm">Innovation - Princeton Journal of Science and Technology</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>For plenty more information on weird beetle facts, check out <a href="http://dbs.umt.edu/research_labs/emlenlab/publications.htm">Professor Douglas Emlen&#8217;s homepage</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/123/evolution-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ig Noble prize for Mathematics goes to CSIRO scientists</title>
		<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/98/ig-noble-prize-for-mathematics-goes-to-csiro-scientists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/98/ig-noble-prize-for-mathematics-goes-to-csiro-scientists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 02:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a media release from the CSIRO today, two of their scientists, Dr Piers Barnes and Ms Nic Svenson have won the 2006 Ig Nobel Prize in Mathematics for &#8220;figuring out how many photographs to take of a group of people to be confident of getting at least one where no-one’s blinking&#8221;. The maths is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.tip.csiro.au/MediaEvents/index.htm">media release from the CSIRO</a> today, two of their scientists, Dr Piers Barnes and Ms Nic Svenson have won the 2006 <a href="http://improbable.com/ig/">Ig Nobel Prize</a> in Mathematics for &#8220;figuring out how many photographs to take of a group of people to be confident of getting at least one where no-one’s blinking&#8221;. The maths is explained briefly in this Velocity article, <a href="http://velocity.ansto.gov.au/velocity/ans0011/article_06.asp">Blink-free photos, guaranteed:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Piers then figured out how many shots I&#8217;d need to be 99% certain of getting a good one. He found that photographing thirty people in bad light would need about thirty shots. Once there&#8217;s around fifty people, even in good light, you can kiss your hopes of an unspoilt photo goodbye.Piers also came up with a rule of thumb for calculating the number of photos to take for groups of less than 20: divide the number of people by three if there&#8217;s good light and two if the light&#8217;s bad.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s a graph to that illustrates the number of photos required to be 99% confident of getting a good one:</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img alt="Photos and Blinks graph" id="image106" src="http://bloodykitty.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/blinkingphotos.gif" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/98/ig-noble-prize-for-mathematics-goes-to-csiro-scientists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queue Jumping Study</title>
		<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/64/queue-jumping-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/64/queue-jumping-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it was Kafka who wrote a story about a man who was so disturbed about the passing of time that he took to waiting in queues so that time, and thus his life, would be spent more slowly. Anyway, they&#8217;ve done a study of attitudes to people jumping lines. Apparently:
When a person intruded into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was Kafka who wrote a story about a man who was so disturbed about the passing of time that he took to waiting in queues so that time, and thus his life, would be spent more slowly. Anyway, <a href="http://tastyresearch.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/cutting-in-line/">they&#8217;ve done a study of attitudes to people jumping lines</a>. Apparently:</p>
<blockquote><p>When a person intruded into a line, this resulted in an objection 54% of the time. However, when 2 people intruded at once, there were objections 91.3%. The figure shows that 73.3% of objections came from people behind the intruder, and the person directly behind the point of intrusion objected most frequently.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m presuming that these were only vocal objections as I thought there would be more if it included unvoiced ones, but you&#8217;d have to read the actual study&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/64/queue-jumping-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girl School Graduates Better Off Because They Don&#8217;t Take Girly Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/61/girl-school-graduates-better-off-because-they-dont-take-girly-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/61/girl-school-graduates-better-off-because-they-dont-take-girly-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BBC NEWS &#124; UK &#124; Education &#124; Girls&#8217; school women &#8216;earn more&#8217;
Women in their 40s who went to single-sex schools subsequently had higher incomes than those in mixed classes, a long-term study shows. Researchers at London University&#8217;s Institute of Education are tracking almost 13,000 people born in 1958. They said boys and girls in single-sex [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/5370970.stm">BBC NEWS | UK | Education | Girls&#8217; school women &#8216;earn more&#8217;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Women in their 40s who went to single-sex schools subsequently had higher incomes than those in mixed classes, a long-term study shows. Researchers at London University&#8217;s Institute of Education are tracking almost 13,000 people born in 1958. They said boys and girls in single-sex schools were less likely to have studied &#8220;gender stereotyped&#8221; subjects.</p></blockquote>
<p>Phew, lucky I changed schools in the second year of high school to an all girls&#8217; school. But isn&#8217;t it nice to know that the reason they earn more is because they were less likely to take up &#8220;female&#8221; occupations, which are paid less than technical or &#8220;male&#8221; jobs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.friendswithcandy.com/blog/61/girl-school-graduates-better-off-because-they-dont-take-girly-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

